Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 3
CHẤT LƯỢNG HỒI TỈNH SAU GÂY MÊ TĨNH MẠCH BẰNG PROPOFOL CHO THỦ THUẬT CHỌC HÚT NOÃN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the quality of recovery after propofol intravenous anesthesia for the oocyte retrieval procedure for in vitro fertilization. Methods: Clinical intervention study with a cross-sectional description of 50 patients was indicated for oocyte retrieval under propofol intravenous general anesthesia. Note any changes in hemodynamics and respiration both during and after the anesthesia, as well as any complications or unintended effects that occurred during the recovery period. Evaluate the quality of recovery in patients by the QoR-40 scale and assess the discharge requirements four hours after the procedure. Results: Time to regain consciousness and time to fully awaken were 4.53 and 12.26 minutes, respectively. There were no complications or unwanted effects during or after the procedure. The research patients had an average QoR-40 score of 184.86/200 points and a hospital discharge standard assessment score of 14/14 points, respectively. Conclusion: Propofol intravenous anesthesia for egg retrieval in in vitro artificial fertilization has a satisfactory recovery quality; there are no difficulties or unintended side effects from the anesthesia. 100% of patients met the requirements for hospital discharge at the fourth hour after the procedure.
Article Details
Keywords
Quality of recovery, intravenous anesthesia,, Propofol, oocyte retrieval
References
2. Paul F White, Dajun Song. New criteria for fast-tracking after outpatient anesthesia: A comparison with the modified Aldrete’s scoring system. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88:1069-7210
3. Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn quy trình kỹ thuật chuyên ngành Gây mê Hồi sức. 2016.
4. Wikland M, Evers H, Jacobsson AH, Sandqvist U, Sjoblom P. The concentration of lidocaine in follicular fluid when used for paracervical block in a human IVF-ET programme. Human Reproduction. 1990; 5:920-923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list].
5. Tsen L, Schultz R, Martin R, et al. Intrathecal low dose bupivacaine versus lidocaine for in vitro fertilization procedures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 26:56-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list].
6. Trịnh Xuân Trường, Hoàng Văn Chương, Nguyễn Ngọc Thạch và CS. Gây mê tĩnh mạch bằng propofol và fentanyl cho thủ thuật chọc hút noãn. Tạp chí Y Dược học Quân sự. 2015; 1:111-117.
7. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-40. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2000; 84(1):11-15.
8. Se Hee Naa, Kyu Hee Jeongb, Dahae Eumb, et al. Patient quality of recovery on the day of surgery after propofol total intravenous anesthesia for vitrectomy A randomized controlled trial. Medicine. 2018; 97:40.
9. Vũ Hoàng Phương, Trần Thị Vân, Nguyễn Văn Chung. So sánh chất lượng hồi tỉnh sau mổ của Desflurane so với TCI propofol ở bệnh nhân gây mê mask thanh quản trong phẫu thuật tán sỏi tiết niệu tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội năm 2022. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023; 532(2):227-230.
10. Imad T Awad, Frances Chung. Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery [Les facteurs influençant la récupération et la sortie après une opération en chirurgie ambulatoire]. Can J Anesth. 2006; 53(9):858-872.
11. Leonard UE, Daniel, Joanna Serafin, et al. Discharge readiness after propofol with or without dexmedetomidine for colonoscopy a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131:279-286
12. Valanne J. Recovery and discharge of patients after long propofol infusion vs. isoflurane anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992 Aug; 36(6):530-533. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03513.x. PMID: 1514337.