THE VALUE OF PREVEDELLO SIGN ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR DIAGNOSIS OF IDIOPATHIC HEMIFACIAL SPASM

Nhật Quang Nguyễn, Thanh Dũng Lê, Nguyen Duy Hung

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the value of the Prevedello sign on 3D T2W and 3D TOF magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in the diagnosis of neurovascular conflict of the hemifacial spasm. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study on 64 patients diagnosed with idiopathic hemifacial spasm who underwent microvascular decompression surgery at Viet Duc Hospital from January 2022 to January 2024. Prevedello sign were evaluated on MRI to analyze the diagnostic value of neurovascular conflicts. Results: Among the 64 patients, the majority were female (75.4%), with a mean age of 51.94. The most common neurovascular conflict was AICA (64.6%), followed by PICA (18.5%) and VA (15.4%). There were 64 neurovascular conflicts detected, among which 58 cases were correctly diagnosed on the same side as the symptoms, with a sensitivity of 90.62%, specificity of 93.75%, positive predictive value of 99.64%, and accuracy of 90.78%. Conclusion: Prevedello sign are very helpful in identifying neurovascular conflicts in patients with hemifacial spasms. When these signs are present, combined with clinical information and routine evaluation, they increase MRI sensitivity to over 90% without increasing the risk of harm to the patient or additional costs.

Article Details

References

1. Hyun SJ, Kong DS, Park K. Microvascular decompression for treating hemifacial spasm: Lessons learned from a prospective study of 1,174 operations. Neurosurg Rev. 2010; 33(3):325-334; discussion 334. DOI:10.1007/s10143-010-0254-9
2. Wang A, Jankovic J. Hemifacial spasm: Clinical findings and treatment. Muscle Nerve. 1998; 21(12):1740-1747. DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199812) 21:12<1740::aid-mus17>3.0.co;2-v
3. Tan NC, Chan LL, Tan EK. Hemifacial spasm and involuntary facial movements. QJM. 2002; 95(8):493-500. DOI:10.1093/qjmed/95.8.493
4. Hermier M. Imaging of hemifacial spasm. Neurochirurgie. 2018; 64(2): 117-123. DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2018. 01.005
5. Finger G, Wu KC, Vignolles-Jeong J, et al. A new finding on magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of hemifacial spasm with high accuracy and interobserver correlation. Brain Sci. 2023; 13(10):1434. DOI:10.3390/ brainsci13101434
6. Sindou MP. Microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm. Importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005; 147(10): 1019-1026; discussion 1026. DOI:10.1007/ s00701-005-0583-6
7. Campos-Benitez M, Kaufmann AM. Neurovascular compression findings in hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg. 2008; 109(3):416-420. DOI:10.3171/JNS/2008/ 109/9/0416
8. Sindou M, Keravel Y. Neurosurgical treatment of primary hemifacial spasm with microvascular decompression. Neurochirurgie. 2009; 55(2):236-247. DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2009.02.012
9. Ohta M, Kobayashi M, Wakiya K, Takamizawa S, Niitsu M, Fujimaki T. Preoperative assessment of hemifacial spasm by the coronal heavily T2-weighted MR cisternography. Acta Neurochir. 2014; 156(3):565-569. DOI:10.1007/s00701-013-1941-4
10. Ahmad HS, Blue R, Ajmera S, et al. The influence of radiologist practice setting on identification of vascular compression from magnetic resonance imaging in trigeminal neuralgia. World Neurosurg. 2023; 171:e398-e403. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.026