EVALUATION OF THE PAIN RELIEF EFFECTIVENESS OF SPLANCHNIC NERVE NEUROLYSIS IN UPPER ABDOMINAL PAIN AT NATIONAL CANCER HOSPITAL.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the pain relief effectiveness of splanchnic nerve neurolysis in upper abdominal pain. Methods: A comparative intervention study on 45 cancer patients with upper abdominal pain with VAS ≥ 7 points and meeting selection criteria. Clinical intervention research method without control group from March 2022 to August 2023 at National Cancer Hospital. Results: 45 patients included 20 males and 25 females, the average age was 62.1 ± 10.9. Before the intervention, the pain was much more severe, with VAS ≥ 7 points. After one week of intervention, all patients achieved the expected level of pain relief, including 40/45 patients with good results and 5/45 patients with effective results. The effect is maintained after one month. Common complications are postural hypotension (13.3%) and alcohol intoxication (13.3%). There were no cases of serious complications. Conclusion: The results show that the splanchnic nerve neurolysis technique using absolute alcohol under the guidance of CT and DSA is an effective and relatively safe intervention method for persistent pain in the upper abdomen. Using CT or DSA guidance both brings positive results; the choice depends on available conditions.
Article Details
Keywords
Splanchnic nerve neurolysis, Upper abdominal pain, VAS
References
2. Dong D, Zhao M, Zhang J, et al. Neurolytic splanchnic nerve block and pain relief, survival, and quality of life in unresectable pancreatic cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2021; 135(4):686-698. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003936
3. Matsumoto T, Yoshimatsu R, Osaki M, et al. Percutaneous splanchnic nerve neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety for cancer-related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(6):324. DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07746-y
4. Fujita Y. CT-guided neurolytic splanchnic nerve block with alcohol. Pain. 1993; 55(3):363-366. DOI:10.1016/ 0304-3959(93)90012-E
6. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(Suppl 1):17-24. DOI:10.1007/ s00586-005-1044-x
7. Đỗ Thị Thu Thủy. Đánh giá hiệu quả giảm đau của phương pháp diệt hạch đám rối thân tạng bằng tiêm cồn tuyệt đối dưới hướng dẫn của chụp cắt lớp vi tính. 2014.http://thuvien. hmu.edu.vn/pages/cms/search.aspx?wp id=DSearchRender
8. Đinh Gia Khánh, Lê Duy Dũng, Mai Thị Khuyên, Nguyễn Văn Tuyến, Trần Quốc Tuấn, Ngô Quang Tùng. Đánh giá hiệu quả giảm đau bằng tiêm cồn tuyệt đối diệt hạch đám rối thân tạng dưới hướng dẫn của cắt lớp vi tính và robot maxio. vjrnm. 2021; (45):24-
30. DOI:10.55046/vjrnm.45.66.2021
9. Comlek S. Pain control with splanchnic neurolysis in pancreatic cancer patients unresponsive to celiac plexus neurolysis. J Pain Res. 2020; 13:2023-2031. DOI:10.2147/JPR.S266689
10. Lê Xuân Chính. Đánh giá hiệu quả giảm đau diệt đám rối thân tạng dưới hướng dẫn của cắt lớp vi tính. Tạp chí Y học thực hành. 2020:147-150.
11. Gupta A, ed. Interventional Pain medicine. Oxford University Press. 2012.