RESEARCH ON ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF CONTINUOUS FASCIA ILIACA COMPARTMENT BLOCK WITH LEVOBUPIVACAINE FOLLOWING HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Hoai Nam Tran 1, Hoang Quan Tran2, Cong Doan Bui3, Xuan Tien Nguyen3, Ngoc Thach Nguyen1,
1 Military Hospital 103
2 Military Hospital 120
3 Military Hospital 175

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with levobupivacaine following hip arthroplasty and its effects on some circulatory, respiratory parameters and adverse effects of the method. Methods: A prospective, descriptive uncontrolled study was conducted on 42 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia at the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Military Hospital 175, from January 2025 to March 2026. Postoperatively, all patients received an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment catheter insertion and an injection of 30mL of levobupivacaine 0.2%, as well as an infusion of levobupivacaine 0.1% at 4 mL/hour for 72 hours. Results: The mean VAS (visual analogue score) at rest was below 3, and the mean VAS on movement was below 4 after levobupivacaine administration. Only 4.8% of cases required “pain rescue”. The percentage of satisfied and highly satisfied patients was 90.4%. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and SpO₂ changed within physiological limits during 72 hours of FICB. Paraesthesia occurred in 40.5%; motor block at Bromage grade 1 and grade 2 was 31% and 11.9%, respectively. Pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and catheter site infection were 11.9%, 7.1%, and 2.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Continuous FICB with levobupivacaine provides effective pain control with minimal effects on respiration and circulation; adverse effects were transient and easily manageable after hip replacement surgery (hip arthroplasty) in the studied patient group.

Article Details

References

1. Hebbard P, Ivanusic J, Sha S. Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block: a cadaveric evaluation of a novel approach. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(4):300-5.
2. Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Practice and Research in Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2005;19(2):247-68.
3. Lê Sỹ Tiến. Đánh giá hiệu quả giảm đau sau mổ thay khớp háng bằng kỹ thuật gây tê khoang mạc chậu liên tục dưới hướng dẫn siêu âm. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2024;28(1):54-9.
4. Nguyễn Tiến Đức, Nguyễn Quang Huy, Nguyễn Trung Kiên. Đánh giá tác dụng không mong muốn của gây tê khoang mạc chậu liên tục bằng bupivacain sau phẫu thuật thay khớp háng. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024;542(1).
5. Kang XH, Bao FP, Xiong XX, et al. Major complications of epidural anesthesia: a prospective study of 5083 cases at a single hospital. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2014;58(7):858-66.