CHARACTERISTICS OF FAT MASS, LEAN MASS, AND BONE MINERAL DENSITY BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN PEOPLE OVER 40 YEARS OLD WITH METABOLIC SYNDROME
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Objectives: To determine the composition of lean mass (LM), fat mass (FM), and bone mineral density by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in people over 40 years old with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study on 199 subjects with or without MetS (defined by the 2005 update NCEP ATP III criteria) who were examined and treated at Hai Phong Medical University Hospital from 2017 to 2022. The composition of LM, FM and bone mineral density were measured using DXA. Results: Total FM, total LM in individuals with MetS were higher than those in non-MetS (p < 0.01). FM regions (trunks, android, arms) and A/G FM ratio, LM regions (trunks, android, gynoid), and FM% regions (trunks, android) of MetS subjects were higher than those without MetS (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, legs FM, legs FM%, arms FM%, gynoid FM%, total FM %, legs LM, and arms LM were not different between both groups (p > 0.05). The bone mineral density (BMD) of people with MetS was higher than that of subjects without MetS (p < 0.05) at several positions: ribs and arms, however, stratified by BMI, there was no significant difference in BMD (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Total LM and total FM in MetS subjects were higher than in non-MetS. FM regions (arms, android, trunks) and A/G FM ratio, LM regions (trunks, android, gynoid), and FM% regions (trunks, android) of MetS subjects were higher than those without MetS. Total and regional BMD (ribs, arms) of MetS subjects were higher than those without MetS. However, there was no difference in BMD stratified by BMI between the two groups.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), Fat mass, Lean mass, Metabolic syndrome (MetS)
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Zhang, X., et al. (2013). Associations of leg fat accumulation with adiposity-related biological factors and risk of metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring); 21(4):824-30.
3. Chin, K.Y., et al. (2020). Positive association between metabolic syndrome and bone mineral density among Malaysians. Int J Med Sci; 17(16): 2585-2593.
4. S. M. Muraduzzaman, S. Begum, and A. Siddika (2021). Association between osteoporosis and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. European Journal of Clinical Medicine; 2(6):15-18.
5. Kang, S.M., et al. (2011). Android fat depot is more closely associated with metabolic syndrome than abdominal visceral fat in elderly people. PLoS One; 6(11): e27694.
6. Bonikowske, A.R., et al. (2019). FM index better identifies metabolic syndrome: insights from patients in early outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. J Clin Med; 8(12).
7. Kutac, P., V. Bunc, and M. Sigmund. (2019). Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry demonstrates better reliability than segmental body composition analysis in college-aged students. PLoS One; 14(4):e0215599.
8. Liu, W., et al. (2021). Association between metabolic syndrome and osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Endocrinol; 6691487.
9. Bagherzadeh, M., et al. (2020). Effects of metabolic syndrome on bone health in older adults: the Bushehr elderly health (BEH) program. Osteoporos Int; 31(10):1975-1984.