Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 28/09/2024
Abstract Views: 33
Views PDF: 9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v49i7.881
Issue
Vol. 49 No. 7 (2024): TẠP CHÍ Y DƯỢC HỌC QUÂN SỰ SỐ 7 - 2024
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Phung, A. T., Nguyễn, N. L., & Nguyễn, D. T. (2024). THE ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF AORTIC ARCH AND ITS BRANCHS ON 64 ROW-DETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 49(7), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v49i7.881

THE ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF AORTIC ARCH AND ITS BRANCHS ON 64 ROW-DETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Phung Anh Tuan1, , Như Lâm Nguyễn2, Duy Trinh Nguyễn3
1 Bệnh viện Quân y 103
2 Học viện Quân y
3 Bệnh viện Tâm Anh Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluation the anatomical characteristic of aortic arch and its branchs on 64 row-detector CT in patients with and without stroke. Subjects and methods: a cross – sectional study of 238 patients that were treated at 103 Military Hospital from Jan 2023 to Jun 2024. The classification of Karacan A. was used. The comparisons of some anatomical parameters with age and gender were performed. Results: The normal branching pattern of aortic arch was 79.8%. The diameters of brachiocephalic trunk, left subclavian and common carotid arteries were 1.49 ± 0.26 cm, 1.27 ± 0.25 cm, 0.97 ± 0.19 cm, respectively. The diameters of left subclavian artery in male were greater than that in female. The diameters of brachiocephalic trunk in group with variant were greater than that without variant. Conclusion: There was relationship between the diameter of left subclavian and sex. No relationship was found between sex with variant

Article Details

Keywords

aortic arch,, branching,, computed tomography,, variant, stroke

References

1. Tasdemir R, Cihan ÖF, Ince R, et al. Anatomical variations in aortic arch branching pattern: A computed tomography angiography study. Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36731.
2. Kumar R, Kumar I, Singh AK, et al. Diameters of three major branches of arch of aorta and their correlation with each other, age and gender-a computed tomographic study. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2016; 3(4):552-555.
3. Natsis KI, Tsitouridis IA, Didagelos MV, et al. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: Clinical significance and literature review. Surgical radiologic anatomy. 2009; 31:319-323.
4. Karacan A, Türkvatan A, and Keziban K. Anatomical variations of aortic arch branching: evaluation with computed tomographic angiography. Cardiology in the Young. 2014; 24(3): 485-493.
5. Manole AM, Iliescu DM, Rusali A, et al. Morphometry of the aortic arch and its branches. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2013; 19(3):154-159.
6. Popieluszko P, Henry BM, Sanna B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of variations in branching patterns of the adult aortic arch. Journal of vascular surgery. 2018; 68(1):298-306.
7. Đặng Nguyễn Trung An. Nghiên cứu kích thước và phân nhánh của động mạch chủ ở người Việt Nam trưởng thành, Luận án Tiến sỹ Y học. 2020, Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
8. Dumfarth J, Chou AS, Ziganshin B, et al. Atypical aortic arch branching variants: A novel marker for thoracic aortic disease. The Journal of thoracic cardiovascular surgery. 2015; 149(6): 1586-1592.
9. Malone CD, Urbania TH, Crook SE, et al. Bovine aortic arch: A novel association with thoracic aortic dilation. Clinical radiology. 2012; 67(1):28-31.
10. Dudich K, Bhadelia R, and Srinivasan J. Anomalous vertebral artery origin may be an independent risk factor for arterial dissection. European journal of neurology. 2005; 12(7):571-572.