OUTCOME OF LONG STEM BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE IN PEOPLE OLDER THAN 80 YEARS

Hoang The Hung , Hoàng Anh Đặng, Sỹ Tiến Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: to evaluate the outcomes of long stem bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in people older than 80 years. Methods: seventy two patients aged over 80 years underwent hemiarthroplasty to treat unstable intertrochanteric fractures at Joints Surgery Department, Military Hospital 103 from January 2019 to January 2022 and were followed up over 12 months. Results: The cohort comprised 23 men (31.9%) and 49 women (68.1%), mean of age 86.39 ± 3.7 (80 – 97 years). The duration of hospital stay postoperative was 10.9 ± 5.9 days (range 7-39). There were 16 patients with complications after surgery, 8 (11.1%) patient deaths at the twelve-month follow-up. The Barthel index score at 12 months was less than prior to fracture (85.9 vs. 96.9 points), recovery rate was 88% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: long stem hemiarthroplasty is an effective treatment choice for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture in people older than 80 years. The rate of complication was 22.2%, the rate of death was 11.1%, recovery rate was 88%.

Article Details

References

1. Jensen JS. Trochanteric fractures. An epidemiological, clinical and biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1981; 188:1-100.
2. Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, et al. Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop. 2001; 25: 360-2. 140-6.
3. Rawate P, Kale AR, Sonawane CS. Functional outcome of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur in elderly: An Indian perspective. Int J Sci Study. 2017; 5:48-53.
4. Kayali C, Agus H, Ozluk S, et al. Treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: internal fixation versus cone hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006; 14:240-244.
5. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 10:S1-S133.
6. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, et al. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; 186:45-56.
7. Vũ Trường Thịnh, Trần Minh Long Triều, Dương Ngọc Lê Mai và CS. Mô tả đặc điểm và đánh giá kết quả thay khớp háng bán phần chuôi dài không xi măng ở bệnh nhân cao tuổi gãy liên mấu chuyển xương đùi tại Bệnh viện Việt Đức. Tạp chí nghiên cứu y học. 2022; 151(3):42-51.
8. Shuangjian H, Bin Y, Jian Z, et al. High failure rate of proximal femoral locking plate in fixation of trochanteric fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018; 13(248):1-9.
9. Tronzo RG. The use of an endoprosthesis for severely comminuted trochanteric fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1974; 5:679-681.
10. Knauf T, Buecking B, Hack J, et al. Development of the Barthel Index 5 years after hip fracture: Results of a prospective study. Geriatrics & Gerontology International. 2019:1-6.
11. Ana PM, Elena I, Luis G, et al. The use of Barthel index for the assessment of the functional recovery after osteoporotic hip fracture: One year follow-up. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(2):e0212000.