Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 18/01/2023
Abstract Views: 303
Views pdf: 538
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v47i9.218
Issue
Vol. 47 No. 9 (2022): TẠP CHÍ Y DƯỢC HỌC QUÂN SỰ SỐ 9 - 2022
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Nguyen, T. H., Le, L. T. T. N., Lan Huong, L. H., Nghiem, D. T., & Quan, T. N. (2023). DESCRIPTION OF CLINICAL SYMPTOMS COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES AND HISTOPATHOLOGY OF CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 47(9), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v47i9.218

DESCRIPTION OF CLINICAL SYMPTOMS COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES AND HISTOPATHOLOGY OF CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS

Nguyen Thi Huyen, Lê Thị Tuyết Ngân, Do Lan Huong, Nghiem Duc Thuan, Quan Thanh Nam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe clinical symptoms, computed tomography (CT) images, and histopathology of chronic rhinosinusitis. Subjects and methods: A descriptive prospective study of case series on 33 patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery from January to August 2022. Results: The mean total SNOT-20 score is 16.45 ± 5.82; the mean Lund - Kennedy score: 4.7 ± 1.33; the mean Lund - Mackay score: 4.82 ± 1.84; the number of cells /HPF: Eosinophil (63.33 ± 97.1), Neutrophil/ HPF (4.3 ± 7.88) and Lymphoma/ HPF (36.36 ± 29); percentage of gland cells 76 - 100% (69.7%); squamous metaplasia (27.3%); edematous stroma (81.8%); stromal fibrosis (51.5%); degree of inflammation: Moderate (45.5%). Conclusion: The scales should be used to increase objectivity in the assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis based on clinical symptoms, paraclinical symptoms, and sinosinus CT images, and performing histopathology in order to have basic for treating chronic rhinosinusitis.

Article Details

Keywords

computed tomography scan, histopathology, chronic rhinousinusitis

References

1. Marcus S., Roland L. T., DelGaudio J. M., et al (2019). The relationship between allergy and chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 4(1):13-17.
2. Snidvongs K., Lam M., Sacks R., et al (2012). Structured histopathology profiling of chronic rhinosinusitis in routine practice. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2(5):376-385.
3. Fokkens Wytske J. (2020). Executive summary of EPOS 2020 including integrated care pathways. Rhinology; (58):82-111.
4. Gliklich R. E., Metson R. (1995). The health impact of chronic sinusitis in patients seeking otolaryngologic care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 113(1):104-109.
5. Razmpa Ebrahim, Saedi Babak, Dostee Amin, et al (2013). Correlation of preoperative sinusitis patients' characteristics with final diagnostic findings. Acta medica Iranica; 51:525-529.
6. Bhattacharyya T., Piccirillo J., Wippold F. J., 2nd (1997). Relationship between patient-based descriptions of sinusitis and paranasal sinus computed tomographic findings. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 123(11):1189-1192.
7. Ryan W. R., Ramachandra T., Hwang P. H. (2011). Correlations between symptoms, nasal endoscopy, and in-office computed tomography in post-surgical chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Laryngoscope; 121(3):674-678.
8. Aslan F., Altun E., Paksoy S., et al (2017). Could Eosinophilia predict clinical severity in nasal polyps? Multidiscip Respir Med; 12:21.
9. Soler Z. M., Sauer D. A., Mace J., et al (2009). Relationship between clinical measures and histopathologic findings in chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 141(4):454-461.
10. Võ Thanh Quang (2004). Nghiên cứu chẩn đoán và điều trị viêm đa xoang mạn tính qua phẫu thuật nội soi chức năng mũi-xoang. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội.
11. Amine M., Lininger L., Fargo K. N., et al (2013). Outcomes of endoscopy and computed tomography in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 3(1):73-79.
12. Bhattacharyya N., Fried M. P. (2003). The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope; 113(1):125-129.
13. Raman Anish, Papagiannopoulos Peter, Kuhar Hannah N., et al (2018). Histopathologic Features of Chronic Sinusitis Precipitated by Odontogenic Infection. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy; 33(2): 113-120.