ASSESSMENT OF CORNEAL ASTIGMATISM USING SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN CATARACT SURGERY CANDIDATES

Dinh Ngan Nguyen1, , Thi Hang Vo1, Hoang Son Truong2
1 Military Hospital 103
2 Vietnam Military Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the characteristics of corneal astigmatism measured by Swept-Source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in cataract patients aged > 60 years and to evaluate the correlations among different astigmatic components. Methods: The cross-sectional descriptive study included 247 eyes of 208 patients examined at Military Hospital 103, from July 2025 to March 2026. Corneal astigmatic parameters were directly measured using the Anterion. Results: Total corneal astigmatism (TCA) was significantly higher than anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) (1.05 ± 0.74D vs. 0.91 ± 0.65D); p < 0.001. Posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) was -0.29 ± 0.14D, with 96.4% demonstrating against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism in optical terms, leading to significant alterations in TCA, including a reduction of 0.16D in with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism and increases of 0.34D and 0.12D in ATR and oblique astigmatism, respectively. PCA also induced axis shifts, particularly in eyes with anterior WTR and oblique astigmatism. Vector analysis confirmed a predominance of ATR astigmatism in the study population (J0 = -0.25) and demonstrated a strong correlation between TCA and ACA, as well as a moderate correlation with PCA. Conclusion: PCA is an integral component of TCA and has a significant impact on overall corneal astigmatic power. Reliance solely on ACA measurements may lead to errors in both magnitude and axis estimation of true corneal astigmatism in the elderly.

Article Details

References

1. Douglas D. Koch, et al. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(12):2080-2087.
2. Jin YY, Zhou Z, Yuan XY, et al. Effect of the posterior corneal surface on total corneal astigmatism in patients with age-related cataract. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11(6):958-965.
3. Stewart S, et al. Effect of posterior corneal surgically induced astigmatism on toric intraocular lens power calculations. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2025; 19:169-176.
4. Feizi S, et al. Mean posterior corneal power and astigmatism in normal versus keratoconic eyes. Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research. 2018; 13(2):163-169.
5. Lin J, An D, Wu H. Quantifying posterior corneal astigmatism's contribution to ocular residual astigmatism: Implications for personalized refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2025; 45(1):143.
6. Han X, Fan Q, Hua Z, et al. Analysis of corneal astigmatism and aberration in chinese congenital cataract and developmental cataract patients before cataract surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21(34).
7. Næser K, Savini G, Bregnhøj JF. Age-related changes in with-the-rule and oblique corneal astigmatism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; DOI: 10.1111/aos.13683.
8. Saha I, Dixit M. Understanding the pattern of astigmatism among patients undergoing cataract surgery in a tertiary care hospital. J Opto Ophth. 2025; 5(1):7-15.
9. Yu Chunxia, Fang X, Tao J, et al. Analysis of differences between keratometric astigmatism and total corneal astigmatism measured by IOLMaster 700. Int Ophthalmol. 2025; 45:66.
10. Yang S, Jiang Y, Cui G, Li Y. Age- and gender-related characteristics of astigmatism in a myopic population. Front Med. 2022; 9:1011743. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1011743.