CLINICAL AND PARACLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN PATIENTS WITH CONGENITAL AND ACQUIRED MIDDLE EAR CHOLESTEATOMA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To describe and compare the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with congenital and acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 121 patients (80 acquired and 41 congenital cases). Clinical manifestations, hearing characteristics, and temporal bone computed tomography (CT) findings were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: Congenital cholesteatoma was predominantly observed in children aged 3 to < 7 years, whereas acquired cases were mainly found in patients aged ≥13 years. The congenital group presented with subtle clinical manifestations (hearing loss, tinnitus, and otalgia each accounting for 9.76%), while the acquired group showed more pronounced symptoms, including hearing loss (92.5%), tinnitus (78.75%), and otorrhea (72.5%); p < 0.01. Normal hearing was predominant in the congenital group (70.73%), whereas 95.0% of acquired cases exhibited hearing loss, predominantly conductive; an air-bone gap (ABG) > 40dB was more frequently observed in the acquired group (p < 0.01). On CT imaging, lesions were mainly located in the epitympanum (> 90%) in both groups, with no significant difference. However, mastoid pneumatization differed significantly: Well-pneumatized mastoids were predominant in the congenital group (75.6%), while sclerotic mastoids were more common in the acquired group (81.3%); p < 0.01. Conclusion: Congenital and acquired cholesteatomas differ markedly in clinical presentation, hearing characteristics, and mastoid pneumatization on CT imaging. These factors are highly valuable for differential diagnosis and treatment planning.
Keywords
Congenital cholesteatoma, Acquired cholesteatoma, Temporal bone computed tomography, Audiometry
Article Details
References
2. Kalcioglu MT, Bayar Muluk N, Jenkins HA. Neurotology Updates. Springer, 2024.
3. Mourabit FE L, Loudghiri M RHNIA A, et al. Atypical presentation of congenital cholesteatoma in an adult case. Medi Clin Case Rep J. 2024; 2(4):510-513.
4. Nguyễn Hữu Luật, Đào Trung Dũng. Đặc điểm nội soi tai và cắt lớp vi tính cholesteatoma bẩm sinh tai giữa ở trẻ em. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2024; 183(10):237-246.
5. James AL. Cholesteatoma severity determines the risk of recurrent pediatric cholesteatoma more than the surgical approach. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(3):836.
6. Jiang H, Wu C, Xu J, et al. Bacterial and fungal infections promote the bone erosion progression in acquired cholesteatoma revealed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021; 12:761111.
7. Boualam Y, Sbai A, Benfadil D, Lachkar A, El Ayoubi El Idrissi F. Bilateral congenital cholesteatoma in a 13-year-old boy. Cureus. 2025; 17(8).
8. Phạm Minh Đông, Phạm Thanh Thế, Hồ Lê Hoài Nhân. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị cholesteatoma xương thái dương bằng phẫu thuật nội soi tại Bệnh viện Tai Mũi Họng Cần Thơ năm 2023 - 2025. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2025; (85):129-135.
9. Iqbal IZ, Watson C. A study of mastoid pneumatisation and the presence of cholesteatoma in 393 patients. Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2015; 130(1):66-68.
10. Cavaliere M, Ugga L, Monfregola A, et al. Temporal bone CT-based anatomical parameters associated with the development of cholesteatoma. La Radiologia Medica. 2023; 128(9):1116-1124.