EVALUATION OF DIGESTIVE TRACT RECONSTRUCTION IN TOTALLY LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA AT VIETNAM NATIONAL CANCER HOSPITAL

Phạm Văn Bình1, Duc An Thai1, , Duc Duy Nguyen1, Duy Thanh Nguyen1
1 Bệnh viện K

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and incidence of anastomotic inflammation and bile reflux associated with different digestive tract reconstruction methods   in   totally   laparoscopic   gastrectomy   for   gastric   adenocarcinoma. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted on 147 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal digestive tract reconstruction at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and June 2025. Results: Delta-shaped and Finsterer anastomoses were mainly applied in early-stage tumors located in the antral region. Operative time and anastomosis time were significantly longer in the Roux-en-Y group (p < 0.001). The rates of anastomotic leakage and early postoperative complications were low. Bile reflux and anastomotic inflammation were lowest in the Roux-en-Y group and highest in the Finsterer group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Total digestive tract reconstruction during laparoscopic gastrectomy is feasible and safe. The choice of reconstruction method should be individualized based on tumor location, disease stage, and the patient’s general condition.

Article Details

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74(3):229-263.
2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2023; 26(1):1-25.
3. Zong L and Chen P. Billroth I vs. Billroth II vs. Roux-en-Y following distal gastrectomy: A meta-analysis based on 15 studies. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011; 58(109):1413-1424.
4. Kang SH and Kim HH. Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: Current status and future direction. Chin J Cancer Res. 2021; 33(2):133-141.
5. Park SH, Lee CM, Hur H, et al. Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: The KLASS-07: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2024; 110(8):4810-4820.
6. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2011; 14(2):101-112.
7. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan clinical oncology group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016; 46:668-685.
8. Ren Z and Wang WX. Comparison of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: A randomized controlled study. Adv Ther. 2019; 36(11):2997-3006.
9. Lee SH, Kim IH, Kim IH, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes and acute inflammatory response between laparoscopy-assisted and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 89(4):176-182.
10. Zhong X, Wei M, Ouyang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy compared with laparoscopic- assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer: A propensity score-weighting analysis. Front Surg. 2022; 9.