CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHALLENGES IN MILITARY BURN CARE: A DATA ANALYSIS AT LE HUU TRAC NATIONAL BURN HOSPITAL (2021-2025)

Thai Ngoc Minh Nguyen1,2, , Quang Thao Le1,2, Van Vu Hoang1,2
1 Học viện Quân y
2 Bệnh viện Bỏng Quốc gia Lê Hữu Trác, Học viện Quân y

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the clinico-epidemiological characteristics of peacetime military burns (2021 - 2025), compare them with modern warfare burn patterns, and propose military medical orientations. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 174 medical records of military inpatients treated at Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025. Results: Professional military personnel accounted for the highest proportion (33.9%). The leading causes were thermal burns (flame: 39%; scald: 25.7%). The rate of flame burns in the Enlisted Personnel group was 54.3%, significantly higher than in the Officer group (p < 0.05). 100% of electrical and chemical burn cases were deep burns. In the acute burn group, the recovery rate reached 98.1%, while the mortality rate was 1.9%. Conclusion: The peacetime military burns pattern primarily consists of isolated thermal injuries, fundamentally differing from the complex polytrauma characteristics of modern warfare. This reality necessitates an urgent renewal of medical training, shifting the focus from favorable hospital-based treatment to field emergency skills and disaster preparedness.

Article Details

References

1. Wolf SE, Kauvar DS. Burn Care in the Field and Hospital. In: Savitsky E, Eastridge B, editors. Military Medicine in Iraq and Afghanistan: A comprehensive review. Washington, D.C.: Borden Institute. 2020; 145-162.
2. Atiyeh BS, Gunn SWA, Hayek SN. Military and civilian burn injuries during armed conflicts. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2007 Dec; 20(4):203-215.
3. Pallett SJC, Mistry R, Lambert ZL, Semple MG, O'Shea MK. Conflict and catastrophe-related severe burn injuries: A challenging setting for antimicrobial decision-making. J Infect. 2024 Feb; 88(2):106224.
4. Ritenour AE, Baskin TW. Primary blast injury: Update on diagnosis and treatment. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul; 36(7 Suppl):S311-S317.
5. Đoàn Chí Thanh. Tình hình thu dung và điều trị bệnh nhân bỏng nội trú tại Bệnh viện Bỏng Quốc gia Lê Hữu Trác năm 2018. Tạp chí Y học Thảm họa và Bỏng. 2019; 4:23-29.
6. Nsaful KO, Asumanu E, Asante-Mante YK, Ofori E, Ayitey-Smith E. Burn Management at the 37 Military Hospital-A Tertiary Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Mod Plast Surg. 2022; 12:1-12.
7. Page F, Hamnett N, D'Asta F, Jeffery S. Epidemiology of U.K. Military Burns 2008 - 2013. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb; 38(1):e269-276.
8. Keenan S, Riesberg JC. Prolonged field care for the burn patient. J Spec Oper Med. 2017 Fall; 17(3):94-98.
9. Joint Trauma System. Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG): Burn Care. 6th Ed. Fort Sam Houston, TX: US Department of Defense. 2021 Oct.
10. Shingleton S, Folwell J, Jones I, Gleason M, Williams A. Burn wound care strategies for the battlefield and austere settings. Eur Burn J. 2024 Mar; 5(1):49-65.