DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE O-RADS ACR 2022 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM USING ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR SURGICALLY INDICATED OVARIAN TUMORS

Hoang Dinh Anh1, , Kieu Trang Ngo2, Dinh Khanh Hoang1, Xuan Hoai Do3
1 Bệnh viện Quân y 103, Học viện Quân y
2 Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
3 Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic value of the O-RADS ACR 2022 (Ovarian Adnexal Reporting and Data System of the American College of Radiology 2022) in classifying surgically indicated ovarian tumors using ultrasound imaging. Methods: A combined retrospective and prospective, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 182 patients with surgically indicated ovarian tumors at the Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, admitted from December 2023 to May 2025. Results: Among 182 patients (207 ovarian tumors), the rate of benign tumors was 78.8%, borderline was 4.8%, and malignant was 16.4%. The O-RADS categories 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 38.2%, 28.0%, 21.3%, and 12.5%, respectively. Concordance rate: O-RADS 0 - 3: 100.0% benign tumors; O-RADS 4 - 5: 37.1% benign tumors, 14.3% borderline tumors, 48.6% malignant tumors (p < 0.001). Diagnostic value: The cut-off point was 3.5 (between 3 and 4), AUC = 0.962 (95%CI: 0.940 - 0.985; p < 0.01), with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 84.0%. Conclusion: The O-RADS ACR 2022 classification system is a reliable diagnostic tool for classifying surgically indicated ovarian tumors. It plays a crucial role in differentiating between benign and malignant tumors, thereby supporting clinicians in determining appropriate treatment strategies.

Article Details

References

1. Webb PM, Jordan SJ. Global epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024; 21(5):389-400.
2. Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, et al. Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: The UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2025; 29(10):1-93.
3. Strachowski LM, Jha P, Phillips CH, et al. O-RADS US v2022: An Update from the American College of Radiology's Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US Committee. Radiology. 2023; 308(3):e230685.
4. Jha P, Gupta A, Baran TM, et al. Diagnostic Performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk score in women in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(6):e2216370.
5. Vara J, Manzour N, Chacón E, et al. Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(13).
6. Tạ Thị Thúy Hằng. Nhận xét phân loại O-RADS siêu âm trong chẩn đoán khối u buồng trứng tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Hà Nội. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024; 537(1).
7. Su N, Yang Y, Liu Z, et al. Validation of the diagnostic efficacy of O-RADS in adnexal masses. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13(1):15667.
8. Nougaret S, Razakamanantsoa L, Sadowski EA, et al. O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: Pearls and pitfalls. Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):45.