FACTORS AFFECTING THE VARIATION OF TACROLIMUS LEVELS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Thi Kim Phuong Chu1, Thi Cuc Nguyen2, Nguyen The Cuong , Thanh Hien Nguyen1, Dinh Hoa Vu2
1 Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức
2 Trung tâm DI & ADR Quốc gia, Trường Đại học Dược Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze usage characteristics and Tacrolimus (TAC) trough level variability over time, and to analyze some factors affecting the intra-patient variability in TAC exposure in the first year after kidney transplantation. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted based on medical records of patients who underwent kidney transplantation and had regular follow-up at the Department of Kidney Diseases and Dialysis, Viet Duc University Hospital, from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2023. Results: 274 medical records of 274 kidney transplant patients were included. Dosage, trough concentrations, and intra-individual variability (IPV) of TAC trough concentrations tended to decrease over time. Logistic regression analysis revealed factors associated with high IPV (CV > 30%) in the first month after transplantation including concomitant use of azole antifungal agents non-continuously vs. continuously use vs. no use (OR = 16.51; p < 0.001); concomitant use of diltiazem non-continuously vs continuously use or no use (OR = 2.92; p = 0.002); factors during the 2 - 6 month period included hematocrit (OR = 0.86; p = 0.001) and mean C0/D ratio (OR = 1.41; p < 0.001); during the 6 - 12-month period, switching between twice-daily and once-daily formulations compared to no switching was associated (OR = 1.17; p = 0.004). Conclusion: TAC trough levels IPV decrease over time after transplantation. High IPV of TAC levels includes concomitant use of azole antifungal and diltiazem agents non-continuously; hematocrit and switching between twice-daily and once-daily formulations.

Article Details

References

1. Krzyżowska K, Kolonko A, et al. Which kidney transplant recipients can benefit from the initial tacrolimus dose reduction?. Biomed Res Int. 2018:4573452.
2. Kiney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9(3):S1-S155.
3. Hội Ghép tạng Việt Nam. Hướng dẫn Ghép thận Việt Nam. Nhà xuất bản Y học. 2017.
4. Borra LC, Roodnat JI, et al. High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25(8):2757-2763.
5. Kim Eun Jin, Kim Soo Jin, et al. Clinical significance of tacrolimus intra-patient variability on kidney transplant outcomes according to pre-transplant immunological risk. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1):12114.
6. Staatz CE, Tett SE. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004; 43(10):623-653.
7. Stifft F, Stolk LM, et al. Lower variability in 24-hour exposure during once-daily compared to twice-daily tacrolimus formulation in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2014; 97(7):775-780.
8. Bunthof KLW, Al-Hassany L, et al. A randomized crossover study comparing different tacrolimus formulations to reduce intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 15(4):930-941.