ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES FOR MITRAL VALVE REPAIR AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 103
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the results of mitral valve repair in patients with mitral regurgitation. Methods:A retrospective, descriptive study without a control group was conducted on 52 patients with chronic mitral regurgitation who underwent mitral valve repair at Military Hospital 103, from June 2018 to August 2024. Results:The mean age was 59.9 ± 11.6, ranging from 31 to 79, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.7/1. A total of 73.1% of patients were classified as NYHA II, and 26.9% had NYHA III. 30.8% of patients had atrial fibrillation; 69.2% had sinus rhythm. Intraoperative findings were noted in posterior valve leaflets (38.5%), anterior valve leaflets (34.6%), and both valve leaflets (23.1%), while 3.8% of individuals had simple valve annular dilatation. Mitral valve repair was successfully performed in 98.1% of cases, while 1.9% failed. Neo-chordae were implanted in 45.1% of patients, and 49/51 patients underwent mitral valve annuloplasty with a ring.Tricuspid valve repair was performed in 58.8% of patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 9.8% of patients. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time was 145.7 ± 38.9 minutes, and the aortic cross-clamp time was 107.5 ± 30.1 minutes. Postoperative complications were observed in 4 cases with low cardiac output syndrome, requiring intra-aortic balloon pump implantation, and 2 patients having wound infections. No deaths were recorded during the follow-up period. At the end of the study, 84.3% of patients were classified as NYHA I, and only 2 patients had moderate mitral regurgitation. Conclusion: Mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation provides excellent surgical outcomes, with high survival rates and a low rate of complications.
Keywords
Mitral valve regurgitation, Mitral valve repair, Valve disease
Article Details
References
2. Shimizu A, Kasegawa H, Tabata M, et al. Long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair for isolated commissural prolapse: Up to 17-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99(1):43-47.
3. Chauvaud S, Fuzellier F, Berrebi A, et al. Long-term (29 years) results of reconstructive surgery in rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation. 2001; 104(12 Suppl 1):12-15.
4. Perier P, Clausnizer B, Mistarz K. Carpentier "sliding leaflet" technique for repair of the mitral valve: Early results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 57(2): 383-386.
5. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, et al. Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: Rationale for optimizing surgical indications. Circulation. 1999; 99(3):400-405.
6. Miura T, Eishi K, Yamachika S, et al. Systolic anterior motion after mitral valve repair: Predicting factors and management. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 59(11):737-742.
7. Lee EM, Shapiro LM, Wells FC. Mortality and morbidity after mitral valve repair: The importance of left ventricular dysfunction. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995; 4(5):460-468; discussion 469-470.
8. Maganti M, Badiwala M, Sheikh A, et al. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after isolated mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140(4):790-796.
9. Phạm Thành Đạt. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu thuật nội soi sửa van hai lá điều trị hở van hai lá đơn thuần tại Bệnh viện E. Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2022.
10. David TE, et al. Long-term results of mitral valve repair for regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(8):1044-1053.