Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 10/12/2025
Abstract Views: 233
Views PDF: 34
DOI: 10.56535/jmpm.v50si4.1495
Issue
Vol. 50 No. si4 (2025): JOURNAL OF MILITARY PHARMACO-MEDICINE - SPECIAL ISSUE 12/2025
Section
Special issue celebrating the 75th anniversary of Military Hospital 103
How to Cite
Ngo, Q. L., Nguyen, D. H., & Nguyen, G. H. (2025). RESEARCH ON THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF STROKE TYPES OF SOME CLINICAL SCALES IN STROKE PATIENTS AT THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, MILITARY HOSPITAL 103. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 50(si4), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v50si4.1495

RESEARCH ON THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF STROKE TYPES OF SOME CLINICAL SCALES IN STROKE PATIENTS AT THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, MILITARY HOSPITAL 103

Quy Lam Ngo1, Dang Hai Nguyen1, , Giang Hoa Nguyen1
1 Bệnh viện Quân y 103

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the differential diagnostic value of hemorrhagic stroke (HS) and ischemic stroke (IS) of some clinical scales. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,742 stroke patients who were admitted and diagnosed at Military Hospital 103. Results: 333 patients (19.12%) had HS and 1,409 patients (80.88%) had IS. The sensitivity in diagnosing HS of the Clinical Stroke Scale (CSS) was 97.6%, the Allen score was 79.58%, the Tp.HCM score was 87.09%, the Sirijai’s Stroke Score (SSS) was 86.77%; the specificity of the CSS score was 90.28%; the Allen score was 92.05%; Tp.HCM score was 92.41%; SSS score was 96.95%. Conclusion: The diagnostic sensitivity of HS and the negative predictive value of the three scales, including CSS, SSS, and Tp.HCM, were higher than those of the Allen scale. The specificity, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy of all four scales were high.

Keywords

Stroke, Stroke scale, Stroke diagnosis

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Văn Chương. Thực hành lâm sàng thần kinh học, Tập III. Bệnh học Thần kinh. Nhà xuất bản Y học. Hà Nội. 2005.
2. Nguyễn Bá Thắng. Kiểm chứng giá trị thang điểm lâm sàng chẩn đoán phân biệt nhồi máu não và xuất huyết não trên lều. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2003 ; 7 (phụ bản số 1):23-28.
3. A Ozeren SB, R Burqut, Y Sarica, H Bozedemir. Accuracy of bedside diagnosis versus Allen and Siriraj Score in Turkish Patients. Eur J Neurol. 2006; 13(6):611-615.
4. Lương Công Thức. Góp phần nghiên cứu lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và đánh giá thang điểm Siriraij trong chẩn đoán phân biệt giữa nhồi máu não và chảy máu não. Học viện Quân y. 2002.
5. Lâm Quốc Vương. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng và giá trị chẩn đoán phân biệt thể bệnh của thang điểm lâm sàng đột quỵ não. Học viện Quân y. 2009.
6. Akpunonu BE, MA, Lee L, Khuder S, Federman DJ, Roberts C. Reliability of Siriraj stroke score to distinguish between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Brain Hemorrhages. March 2023; 4(1):13-16.
7. Hung LY, et al. Clinical distinction between acute hemorrhagic and acute ischemic stroke by Siriraj stroke score. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1995; 55(3):248-552.
8. R Kabir, MP, SE Haque, M Tabassum, F Sultana. Superiority of Siriraj stroke score over Guy’s Hospital score in diagnosing acute hemorrhagic stroke at bedside. KYAMC Journal. 2021; 12(3):142-146.
9. A Sherin, AK, S Rehman, NH Shah, G Shabbier, M Zarif. Comparability and validity of Siriraj stroke score and Allen stroke score in differentiation of acute ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2011; 25(3):206-216.