NGHIÊN CỨU XÂY DỰNG MÔ HÌNH CHẤN THƯƠNG TỦY SỐNG BẰNG KẸP CLIP TRÊN THỰC NGHIỆM

Bá Hiếu Nguyễn1, , Trung Chức Nguyễn1, Thị Mai Trần1, Hữu Cảnh Nguyễn1, Văn Mão Cấn1, Duy Cương Lê2
1 Học viện Quân y
2 Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To establish an experimental model of spinal cord injury (SCI) using the clip compression method in rats. Methods: 16 rats, divided into two groups: sham group (n = 8) and SCI group (n = 8). The SCI model was generated with a compressive force of 70g applied for 60 seconds at the T8 - T10 spinal cord level. Locomotor and sensory parameters were assessed using the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor scale, Rotarod test, the ladder rung walking test and Hot Plate test. Spinal cord tissues were harvested for histological examination. Results: On days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-injury, the BBB scores in the SCI group decreased compared to the sham group (p < 0.05). On days 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-injury, the Rotarod performance time in the SCI group decreased compared to the sham group (p < 0.001); the foot fault rate in the SCI group was higher than that in the sham group (p < 0.001); and the response time in the SCI group was longer than that in the sham group (p < 0.001). Histopathological analysis on days 14 and 28 post-injury revealed features of acute spinal cord injury. Conclusion: The SCI model was successfully established using a compressive force of 70g applied for 60 seconds at the T8 - T10 level in rats, similar to the characteristics of moderate to severe clinical SCI.

Article Details

References

1. Ahuja CS, Nori S, Tetreault L, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury-repair and regeneration. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017; 13(4):241-255.
2. Joshi M, Fehlings MG. Development and characterization of a novel, graded model of clip compressive spinal cord injury in the mouse: Part 1. Clip design, behavioral outcomes, and histopathology. J Neurotrauma. 2002; 19(2):175-190.
3. Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995; 12(1):1-21.
4. Harrison M, O'Brien A, Adams L, et al. Vertebral landmarks for the identification of spinal cord segments in the mouse. Neuroimage. 2013; 68:22-29.
5. Vafaei-Nezhad S, Niknazar S, Norouzian M, et al. Therapeutics effects of [Pyr1] apelin-13 on rat contusion model of spinal cord injury: An experimental study. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2021; 113:101924.
6. Giglio CA, Defino, HLA, Da-Silva CA, et al. Behavioral and physiological methods for early quantitative assessment of spinal cord injury and prognosis in rats. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2006; 39:1613-1623.
7. Khan F, Baseer N, Habib H, et al. Calibrated behaviors assessment in spinal cord compression injury model in rats. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; 6(S9):4846-4856.
8. Cheriyan T, Ryan DJ, Weinreb JH, et al. Spinal cord injury models: A review. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52(8):588-595.
9. Ahmed RU, Alam M, Zheng YP. Experimental spinal cord injury and behavioral tests in laboratory rats. Heliyon. 2019; 5(3).