PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF BLASTOCYST TRANSFER OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TWO BIOPSY METHODS: MR ATHUR 2005 AND CAPALBO 2014

Thị Thủy Trần1, Nguyễn Đình Tảo2, Minh Ngân Hoàng2, , Trần Quang Anh2, Nguyễn Hồng Phúc1
1 Trường Đại học Y Dược Hải Phòng
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa 16A Hà Đông

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of blastocyst transfers following two biopsy methods: MR Athur 2005 and Capalbo 2014. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 172 blastocysts biopsied at 16A Ha Dong General Hospital between 2023 and 2024. Results: A total of 172 blastocysts were included and divided into two groups based on the biopsy method used: Group 1 included 105 blastocysts (61%) biopsied using the MR Athur 2005 method, and Group 2 included 67 blastocysts (39%) biopsied using the Capalbo 2014 method. Good-quality blastocysts accounted for over 50% in both groups. The proportion of average-quality embryos was low (< 1/4 in both groups). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of embryo quality distribution (p = 0.2), implantation rate (53.3% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.2), clinical pregnancy rate (48.6% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.6), or live birth rate (47.6% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.1). Conclusion: The MR Athur 2005 and Capalbo 2014 biopsy techniques yield comparable outcomes in terms of embryo quality, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and survival rates.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Minh Thúy, Giáp Thị Mai Phương, Vũ Thị Mai Anh, Lê Hoàng, Nguyễn Thành Khiêm. Kết quả thai kỳ sau chuyển một phôi nang chuẩn bội: Một nghiên cứu hồi cứu. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2024; 183(10):422-429.
2. Hồ Giang Nam, Trịnh Thế Sơn, Dương Đình Chỉnh và CS. Kết quả chuyển phôi sau thực hiện phương pháp phân tích di truyền không xâm lấn. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024; 543(3). Accessed June 25, 2025. https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/index.php/vmj/article/view/11584
3. Luo S, Li X, Wang Y, et al. Effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies on live birth outcomes and the influencing factors in women of advanced maternal age. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 55(5):1288-1294. DOI: 10.12182/20240960208.
4. Li Piani L, Petrone P, Brutto M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of double trophectoderm biopsy and/or cryopreservation in PGT: Balancing the need for a diagnosis against the risk of harm. Hum Reprod Update. 2025; 31(2):102-115. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae031.
5. Huong T, Ha VH, Nguyen Thi Lien H. P-193 Does the day of laser-assisted hatching affects the clinical outcomes of single vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles? A propensity score-matched study. Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(Supplement_1):deae108-564.
6. Hazır S, Kaplanoğlu İ, Özdemir AA, et al. Comparison of the impact of laser-assisted hatching on fresh cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and association with pregnancy outcomes. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 19(2):130-137. DOI:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.36690.
7. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. Reprod Certain Fertil Genet Beyond. 1999; 1999:378-388.
8. Xiong S, Liu W, Wang J, et al. Trophectoderm biopsy protocols may impact the rate of mosaic blastocysts in cycles with pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(5):1153-1162. DOI:10.1007/ s10815-021-02137-w
9. Vitagliano A, Paffoni A, Viganò P. Does maternal age affect assisted reproduction technology success rates after euploid embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2023; 120(2):251-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.036.
10. Zhang X, Bai L, Ren H, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer cycles in women of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 257:133-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb. 2020. 09.047.
11. Tian H, Zhang H, Qiu H, Yang X, La X, Cui L. Influence of maternal age on the relationship between endometrial thickness and ongoing pregnancy rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective analysis of 2,562 cycles. Front Endocrinol. 2022; 13:821753. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.821753.