CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PREOPERATIVE CEA, CA19-9, AND CA72-4 LEVELS IN PREDICTING OUTCOMES AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION FOR GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Summary
Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic significance of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 levels in predicting outcomes following curative surgery for gastric carcinoma. Subjects and methods: A descriptive study was conducted on 68 patients diagnosed with gastric carcinoma who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 103 Military Hospital, from July 2021 to December 2023. Results: Serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 tended to be higher in tumors with more extensive invasion (p = 0.636, 0.140, and 0.004, respectively), in cases with lymph node metastasis compared to those without (p = 0.228, 0.084, and 0.066, respectively), and in patients with advanced disease stages (p = 0.750, 0.029, and 0.012, respectively). In both univariate and multivariate prognostic models, only CA72-4 demonstrated a statistically significant association with poorer postoperative survival outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although elevated levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 were observed in more advanced stages of gastric cancer, only CA72-4 showed a statistically significant association, indicating its potential as a prognostic biomarker for unfavorable outcomes after curative surgery in patients with gastric carcinoma.
Keywords
Gastric carcinoma, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 72-4, Predicting outcome, Curative resection
Article Details
References
2. Nam DH, Lee YK, Park JC, et al. Prognostic value of early postoperative tumor marker response in gastric cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2013; 20(12):3905-3911.
3. Lee JC, Lee SY, Kim CY, et al. Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society. 2013; 85(6):283-289.
4. Kim DH, Oh SJ, Oh CA, et al. The relationships between perioperative CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 and recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative radical gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2011; 104(6):585-591.
5. Jo JC, Ryu MH, Koo DH, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013; 9(4):324-330.
6. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2020.
7. Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, et al. Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. The American Journal of Surgery. 2001; 181(1):16-19.
8. Yu J, Zhang S, Zhao B. Differences and correlation of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer. Molecular and Clinical Oncology. 2016; 4(3):441-449.
9. Li F, Li S, Wei L, et al. The correlation between pre-operative serum tumor markers and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative treatment. Biomarkers. 2013; 18(7):632-637.
10. Zhu JW, Gong LZ, Wang QW. Serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4, carbohydrate antigen 24-2, ferritin) and gastric cancer prognosis correlation. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(9):2808-2814.