EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION PROTOCOL AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION

Quốc Việt Trần1, Thanh Liêm Lê1, , Mạnh Hà Bùi1, Hải Anh Hoàng1
1 Bệnh viện Quân y 175

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation program after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This is the randomized controlled clinical trial research. Seventy-two patients having stable conditions after PCI will be examined and practice cardiac reachability lessons at the Department of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation at Military 175 Hospital from April 2022 to December 2023. Results: Cardiac rehabilitation is safe for post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients, and there are no cardiovascular, respiratory, or neurological complications during and after training. In out-patient practicing cardiac rehabilitation improved the maximum VO2, accounting for 2,04 ± 1,87 ml/kg (p<0,01), increases the 6 minute walk test to 49 minutes (p<0,01) and increased the quality of life based on the MacNew scale (p<0,01), including physical limitation (p<0,01), emotional function (p<0,05) and social function (p<0,01), which all data have statistically changed. Conclusion: Cardiac rehabilitation is safe and effective in evaluating cardiac function and quality of life for post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients.

Article Details

References

1. World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates: Life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability 2019 [Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/ mortality-and-global-health-estimates.
2. Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, Zwisler AD, Rees K, Martin N, et al. Exercise-Based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(1):1-12.
3. Baykal Şahin H, Kalaycıoğlu E, Şahin M. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 67(2):203-210.
4. Kerrigan DJ, Williams CT, Ehrman JK, Saval MA, Bronsteen K, Schairer JR, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation improves functional capacity and patient-reported health status in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: The Rehab-VAD randomized controlled trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2014; 2(6):653-659.
5. Kim AR NT, Oh HM, Park E, Huh JW, et al. Effect of hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life and physical capacity in acute myocardial infarction patients: 2 years follow up. J Clin Exp Cardiolog. 2018; 9:573.
6. Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V, Halle M, Mezzani A, Vanhees L, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation. 2012; 126(18):2261-2274.
7. El Missiri A, Amin SA, Tawfik IR, Shabana AM. Effect of a 6-week and 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery. Egypt Heart J. 2020; 72(1):69.
8. Beigienė A, Petruševičienė D, Barasaitė V, Kubilius R, Macijauskienė J. Cardiac rehabilitation and complementary physical training in elderly patients after acute coronary syndrome: A pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(6).
9. Ferrer-Sargues FJ, Fabregat-Andrés Ó, Martínez-Hurtado I, Salvador-Coloma P, Martínez-Olmos FJ, Lluesma-Vidal M, et al. Effects of neuromuscular training compared to classic strength-resistance training in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243917.