Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/03/2025
Abstract Views: 5
Views PDF: 3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v50si1.1115
Issue
Vol. 50 No. si1 (2025): TẠP CHÍ Y DƯỢC HỌC QUÂN SỰ - SỐ ĐẶC BIỆT 3/2025
Section
Hội nghị Thần kinh - Đột quỵ não 2025
How to Cite
Trần, H. H., Huỳnh, M. T., & Trần, H. H. (2025). THE VALUE OF SOME SCORES IN PREDICTING OF RECOVERY ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 50(si1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v50si1.1115

THE VALUE OF SOME SCORES IN PREDICTING OF RECOVERY ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS

Nguyễn Văn Quốc1, , Huỳnh Minh Thắng1, Trần Hậu Hoàng1
1 Khoa Tâm Thần kinh, Bệnh viện Quân y 17, Quân khu 5

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between the recovery level of patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and several stroke scales. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 307 IS patients treated at Military Hospital 17 from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were clinically assessed at the time of admission using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index, Orgogozo Scale, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) based on CT and/or MRI brain imaging. The recovery level was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and one month after discharge. Results: The average age of the study patients was 62.88 ± 11.85 years, with 64.8% being under 70 years old. Males accounted for 58.6% with a male-to-female ratio of 1.42:1. Regression analysis showed that only the clinical severity measured by the NIHSS at admission had an independent correlation with the recovery level (measured by mRS) at discharge and one month after discharge, with statistical significance (p < 0.05) and model accuracy of 95% and 81.3%. The linear regression equations of mRS (at discharge and one month after discharge) according to the NIHSS at admission also had accuracies of 94.8% and 78.8% (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The NIHSS had predictive value for the recovery level of IS patients at discharge and one month after discharge.

Article Details

Keywords

Stroke, cerebral infarction, stroke score, recovery prediction

References

1. Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabi M, et al. Stroke: A global response is needed. Bull World Health Organ. 2016; 94(9): 634-634A.
2. Katan M and Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Seminars in Neurology. 2018; 38(2):208-211.
3. Boehme Amelia K, Esenwa Charles, and Elkind Mitchell SV. Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circulation Research. 2017; 120(3): 472-495.
4. Lindsay MP, Norrving B, Sacco RL, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global stroke fact sheet 2019. Int J Stroke. 2019; 14(8):806-817.
5. Go Alan S, Mozaffarian Dariush, Roger Véronique L, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update. Circulation. 2013; 127(1):6-245.
6. Feigin Valery L, Norrving Bo, and Mensah George A. Global burden of stroke. Circulation Research. 2017; 120(3):439-448.
7. Ghandehari K. Challenging comparison of stroke scales. J Res Med Sci. 2013; 18(10):906-910.
8. Schlegel D, Kolb SJ, Luciano JM, et al. Utility of the NIH stroke scale as a predictor of hospital disposition. Stroke. 2003; 34(1):134-137.
9. Tarvonen-Schröder S, Niemi T, and Koivisto M. Inpatient rehabilitation after acute severe stroke: Predictive value of the national institutes of health stroke scale among other potential predictors for discharge destination. Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2023; 12, 27536351231157966.