FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL FEMUR FRACTURE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Nguyễn Trường Giang1, Nguyễn Lĩnh Toàn2, Vũ Nhất Định, Phạm Đăng Ninh, Hoàng Thế Hùng
1 Cục Quân y
2 Học viện Quân y

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objectives: To evaluate the functional outcomes of surgical treatment for proximal femoral fractures. Subjects and methods: This prospective study included 89 cases with proximal fractures of the femur in whom locking plate fixation, or bipolar head arthroplasty was performed between April 2020 and January 2021 at the Orthopedic and Trauma Center, Military Hospital 103. Results: The median age of all patients was 76.42 years (range, 60 - 93 years). The number of proximal femoral fractures that occurred in females (61.8%) was more than in males (38.2%), with p < 0.001. The average surgical delay was 6.39 ± 4.18 days. The mean hospital stay time was 10.58 ± 5.622. There were (6.7%) deaths at the twelve-month follow-up, 14 (15.7%) with complications. The Barthel index score at 12 months was less than prior to fracture (90.42 vs. 98.49 points) (p < 0.001). The number of patients who have recovered from complications was less than those without complications (75% and 94%, respectively, p < 0.001). Recovery rate in the age groups 60 - 69 was reported as 98.6% and 71.61% over 90 years of age Conclusion: The Barthel index is a good tool to evaluate the physical recovery of pre-fracture condition and allows for the assessment of the functional recovery after one-year follow-up.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Dhanwal D.K., Dennison E.M., Harvey N.C., Cooper C. (2011). Epidemiology of hip fracture: worldwide geographic variation. Indian J Orthop; 45:15-22.
2. Ekegren C.L., Edwards E.R., Page R., Hau R., de Steiger R., Bucknill A., et al. (2016). Twelve-month mortality and functional outcomes in hip fracture patients under 65 years of age. Injury; 47(10):2182-2188.
3. Tang V.L., Sudore R., Cenzer I.S., Boscardin W.J., Smith A., Ritchie C., et al. (2017). Rates of Recovery to Pre-Fracture Function in Older Persons with Hip Fracture: an Observational Study. J Gen Intern Med; 32(2):153-158.
4. Caeiro J.R., Bartra A., Mesa-Ramos M., Etxebarría I., Montejo J., Carpintero P., et al. (2017). Burden of First Osteoporotic Hip Fracture in Spain: A Prospective, 12-Month, Observational Study. Calcif Tissue Int; 100(1):29-39.
5. Padrón-Monedero A., López-Cuadrado T., Galán I, Martínez-Sánchez E.V., Martin P., Fernández-Cuenca R. (2017). Effect of comorbidities on the association between age and hospital mortality after fall-related hip fracture in elderly patients. Osteoporos Int; 28(5):1559-1568.
6. Ishidou Y., Koriyama C., Kakoi H., Setoguchi T., Nagano S., Hirotsu M., et al. (2017). Predictive factors of mortality and deterioration in performance of activities of daily living after hip fracture surgery in Kagoshima, Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int; 17(3):391-401.
7. Griffin X.L., Parsons N., Achten J., Fernandez M., Costa. (2015). Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation - A prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J; 97-B(3):372-382.
8. Pioli G., Lauretani F., Pellicciotti F., Pignedoli P., Bendini C., Davoli M.L., et al. (2016). Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors affecting walking recovery after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int; 27(6):2009-2016.
9. En Lin Goha, Robin G. Lerner, Juul Achtena, Nick Parsons, Xavier L. Griffina, Professor Matthew L. Costa (2020). Complications following hip fracture: Results from the World Hip Trauma Evaluation cohort study. Injury; 3:4.
10. Mahoney F.I., Barthel D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal; 14:56-61.