Thanh bên bài viết

PDF
Ngày xuất bản: 28/04/2026
Số lượt xem tóm tắt: 0
Số lượt xem PDF: 0
DOI: 10.56535/jmpm.v51i4.1552
Số xuất bản
Tập 51 Số 4 (2026): TẠP CHÍ Y DƯỢC HỌC QUÂN SỰ SỐ 4 - 2026
Chuyên mục
Bài báo
Trích dẫn bài báo
Vu, H. T., Ngo, T. H., Truong, A. D., Nguyen, V. P., & Tran, T. K. L. (2026). SURVIVAL OF PEDICLED PERFORATOR FLAPS IN LOWER-LEG SOFT-TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION: AN ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS. Tạp chí Y Dược học Quân sự, 51(4), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v51i4.1552

SURVIVAL OF PEDICLED PERFORATOR FLAPS IN LOWER-LEG SOFT-TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION: AN ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS

Vu Huu Trung1, Ngo Thai Hung2, Truong Anh Dung2, Nguyen Van Phu2, Tran Thi Kim Lien3,
1 General Trauma and Microsurgery Department, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University
2 108 Military Central Hospital
3 Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objectives: To evaluate the survival of pedicled perforator flaps and analyze related factors, including rotation angle, pedicle diameter, pedicle length, and flap size. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 55 patients with lower-leg soft-tissue defects treated with pedicled perforator flaps. The effects of flap rotation angle, pedicle diameter, and pedicle length on flap survival were analyzed. Results: 96.4% of flaps survived, achieving effective coverage. Flap width and defect size were significantly associated with flap survival. Pedicle length showed an inverse correlation with flap survival (OR = 0.3). Conclusion: Pedicled perforator flaps represent a reliable option for reconstruction of lower-leg soft-tissue defects. Flap width and defect size are associated with the risk of flap necrosis. A pedicle diameter of ≥ 0.5 mm is safe for flap survival.

Từ khóa

Perforator flap, Soft tissue reconstruction, Lower leg, 320-slice CT, Flap necrosis

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Cohen-Shohet R, et al. Evolution of local perforator flaps in lower extremity reconstruction. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2019; 5:N/A-N/A.
2. Khanh L, et al. Using 320-slice computed tomography to preoperatively investigate the leg perforator arterial system and design a perforator flap for patients with a soft-tissue defect in the leg. in Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique. 2025. Elsevier.
3. Teo TC. Propeller flaps for reconstruction around the foot and ankle. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 2021.;37(01):022-031.
4. Vũ Hữu Dũng. Nghiên cứu giải phẫu và ứng dụng lâm sàng vạt da cơ bụng chân hình đảo cuống ngoại vi. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học, Học viện Quân y: Hà Nội. 2012; 59-60.
5. Vũ Nhất Định. Nghiên cứu giải phẫu và ứng dụng lâm sàng vạt da cân hiển ngoài hình đảo cuống ngoại vi điều trị khuyết hổng phần mềm vùng 1/3 dưới cẳng chân, cổ chân, mắt cá chân và củ gót. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học, Học viện Quân y: Hà Nội. 2004; 58-59.
6. Bekara F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016; 137(1):314-331.
7. Prasad KR, R Gurram, and M Gurram. A study of propeller flaps for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of lower limbs. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2019; 6(1):A1-A7.
8. Mir MA, SF Shahabuddin, and D Kumar. Perforator pedicled propeller flap: A reliable coverage of wounds around ankle. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2019; 27(4):167-171.