COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN ADJUSTABLE- AND FIXED-LOOP DEVICES FOR FEMORAL FIXATION IN ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Vu Anh Dung1, , Pham Ngoc Thang1, Bach Minh Quang2, Nguyen Thanh Thao3, Vu Nhat Dinh1
1 Department of Joint Surgery, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University
2 Vietnam-Cuba Friendship Hospital
3 Military Hospital 354

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objectives: To compare outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with adjustable- and fixed-loop devices. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on 92 patients who underwent ACLR with the fixation of a hamstring graft with the fixed- and adjustable-loop suspensory devices on the femoral side from December 2021 to December 2023. Knee function was evaluated using the Lysholm score, Lachman test, and Pivot-shift test, both preoperatively and at the one-year postoperative follow-up. Results: One year postoperatively, the Lysholm score averaged 90.62 ± 4.167 in the adjustable-loop group, with 83.1% of cases achieving good grades. In comparison, the fixed-loop group had a mean score of 90.15 ± 4.704, with 77.8% of cases obtaining good grades. However, no significant statistical difference was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). A negative pivot shift test was confirmed in 60 cases (92.3%) from the adjustable-loop group and 24 cases (88.9%) from the fixed-loop group (p = 0.5). No cases of infection, graft failure, or flexion limitation were recorded. Conclusion: There were no notable differences in graft laxity and functional outcomes between the fixed- and adjustable-loop devices for femoral fixation in arthroscopic ACLR.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. van Meer BL, et al. Which determinants predict tibiofemoral and patellofemoral osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Aug; 49(15):975-983.
2. Choi NH, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: Comparison between fixed-loop and adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar; 45(4):826-831.
3. Chandru V, et al. Comparison of fixed- and variable-loop button fixation in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Cureus. 2022 Apr 17; 14(4):e24218.
4. Schützenberger S, et al. ACL reconstruction with femoral and tibial adjustable versus fixed-loop suspensory fixation: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 19; 17(1):244.
5. Seo SS, et al. Clinical results comparing transtibial technique and outside in technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013 Sep; 25(3):133-140.
6. Asif N, et al. A prospective randomized study of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with adjustable- versus fixed-loop device for femoral side fixation. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021 Dec 4; 33(1):42.
7. Shahpari O, et al. Clinical outcome of anatomical transportal arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. Arch. Bone Jt. Surg. 2018; 6:130.
8. Briggs KK, et al. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37:890-897.
9. Ranjan R, et al. In vivo comparison of a fixed loop (EndoButton CL) with an adjustable loop (TightRope RT) device for femoral fixation of the graft in ACL reconstruction: A prospective randomized study and a literature review. J. Orthop. Surg. 2018; 26:2309499018799787.