PHASE ANGLE PREDICTOR OF SARCOPENIA IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Nguyen Duy Dong1, , Nguyen Thi Thanh Diem2
1 Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University
2 National Burn Hospital, Vietnam Military Medical University

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objectives: To examine how phase angle (PhA) contributes to sarcopenia and factors influencing sarcopenia in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 52 SIHD patients who were recruited, and relevant data was gathered. Patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia based on the Asian Sarcopenia Working Group 2019 (AWGS 2019) diagnostic criteria. Differences between groups were compared, and statistically significant factors were included in the logistic regression analysis to screen for independent factors affecting sarcopenia. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive value of PhA in sarcopenia. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 36.5% in patients with SIHD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PhA was an independent factor influencing sarcopenia (OR: 0.078; 95%CI: 0.012 - 0.528; p = 0.009). The AUC of PhA predicting sarcopenia was 0.852, p < 0.001; the best PhA cut-off value for sarcopenia was 5.95° for both sexes (sensitivity and specificity were 0.677 and 0.947, respectively); the PhA cut-off points were 6.05° and 5.25° for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: PhA is an important determinant of sarcopenia in patients with SIHD. PhA may have an optimistic predictive value for determining sarcopenia in this population.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: Origins and clinical relevance. The Journal of Nutrition. 1997; 127(5):990S-991S.
2. Zhang N, Wen-Ling Z, Xiao-Hong L, et al. Prevalence and prognostic implications of sarcopenia in older patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology. 2019; 16(10):756-763.
3. Taniguchi R, Deguchi J, Hashimoto T, Sato O. Sarcopenia as a possible negative predictor of limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Annals of Vascular Diseases. 2019; 12(2):194-199.
4. Shimazoe H, Mii S, Koyanagi Y, Ishida M. Impact of low activity of daily living on the prognosis of patients with critical limb ischemia and sarcopenia. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2019; 61:156-164.
5. Hirose S, Nakajima T, Nozawa N, et al. Phase angle as an indicator of sarcopenia, malnutrition, and cachexia in inpatients with cardiovascular diseases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2554.
6. Espirito Santo Silva D, Waitzberg DL, Passos de Jesus R, Oliveira LPMd, Torrinhas RS, Belarmino G. Phase angle as a marker for sarcopenia in cirrhosis. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2019/08/01/ 2019; 32:56-60. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.05.003
7. Chen L-K, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian working group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2020; 21(3):300-307.e2.
8. Kilic MK, Kizilarslanoglu MC, Arik G, et al. Association of bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle and sarcopenia in older adults. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2017; 32(1):103-109.
9. Kosoku A, Uchida J, Nishide S, et al. Association of sarcopenia with phase angle and body mass index in kidney transplant recipients. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1):266.
10. Dos Reis AS, Santos HO, Limirio LS, de Oliveira EP. Phase angle is associated with handgrip strength but not with sarcopenia in kidney transplantation patients. Journal of Renal Nutrition. 2019; 29(3):196-204.